Aktan reported that he has known Nurlan for over a year, and that he received money on the basis of trust.
“Nurlan was eager to sell a Lexus, which is valued at $33,000 on the market, but he was offering it for $22,000-23,000. He claimed that he had already paid $25,000 for the car and only needed to pay another $8,000. After Nurlan contacted me, I connected him with a third party; I did not receive any cash myself. The person who purchased the car gave Nurlan $10,000 in exchange for a promise to provide a power of attorney in two days. After that, the person I connected Nurlan with was supposed to pay him the remaining $12,000 and take the documents,” Aktan explained.
After acquiring the Lexus, the third party planned to ask Aktan to sell the car at market price, for which Aktan expected to receive a commission.“When my acquaintance learned about the situation, he returned the car to Tahir without asking for money. He will now demand that $10,000 from Nurlan,” he added.
Tahir confirmed to Kaktus.media that the Lexus was returned and that the car has no damage, but the mileage has increased by 3,800 km.
He also reported that Erke bulan's parents are asking him to withdraw the complaint against their son, promising to cover the repair costs for the Chery.“I insist that Flagman fully compensate for the damages. Only Aktan helped me find and return the Lexus. Flagman is not taking any action; they are just waiting, acting on the principle of 'my house is on the edge.' However, according to the law, the manager must bear responsibility for the actions of their employees,” Tahir concluded.
