On February 25, a meeting was held in the Jalal-Abad region to discuss the results of the regional court's work over the past year. The event, led by the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Kyrgyz Republic, Mederbek Satyiev, was also attended by several Supreme Court judges, namely Bolotbek Akmatov, Dilara Arstanbaeva, Nurgul Asanova, Sulaymankul Atakulov, and Tynybek Bekeshov. Among those present were the advisor to the chairman, Ruslan Myrzalimov, the director of the Judicial Department, Bakyt Kurmanaliev, the director of the Higher School of Justice, Erkinbek Toktomambetov, and the chairman of the Jalal-Abad Regional Court, Zhipar Sabirova, as well as judges from the local courts of the region.
Mederbek Satyiev, in his speech, emphasized the improvement of the performance indicators of the courts in the Jalal-Abad region for 2025. In particular, he noted the increase in the number of cases considered and the rise in the share of judicial acts upheld.
Significant achievements were observed in the Jalal-Abad Regional Court, as well as in the courts of the Nooken, Ala-Buka, and Aksy districts, as well as in the city courts of Manas, Tash-Kumyr, Kara-Kul, and in the Administrative Court of the region. Some judges demonstrated a high level of approval of judicial acts, which varied from 90 to 100 percent.
In turn, for the positive results and high approval rates of judicial decisions, Mederbek Satyiev expressed gratitude to the chairpersons of the Aksy District Court, the Administrative Court of Jalal-Abad Region, and the Toguz-Toro District Court.
However, in some district courts, including the Suzak, Chatkal, and Mailuu-Suu courts, a decrease in the percentage of upheld judicial acts was observed. For some judges, this indicator ranged from 40 to 60 percent, indicating the need for additional measures to improve the quality of justice and ensure uniformity in judicial practice. The chairman issued instructions to strengthen work in this direction.
The analysis of the cases considered showed that property-related crimes (thefts, fraud), evasion of child support, and drug-related offenses predominated in criminal cases. In civil proceedings, the majority of cases involved divorce disputes, debt recovery, alimony, and inheritance disputes. In administrative proceedings, the main share consisted of complaints about the actions of government bodies regarding land issues.
The chairman noted that the work on summarizing judicial practice at the level of some local courts was conducted inadequately. In several cases, the summaries were reduced to mere statistical data and case summaries, which do not comply with methodological recommendations. The study and summarization of judicial practice are important tools for improving the quality of justice, and the conclusions should be practical and discussed with judges.
During the meeting, information was also presented on measures to expedite the online broadcasting of court sessions, the implementation of automated case distribution, and the equipping of courtrooms with audio and video recording systems.
Citizen appeals indicate the need to enhance the professionalism of staff, ensure polite and open attitudes towards visitors, adhere to procedural deadlines, and strengthen organizational discipline. In some courts, there were instances of untimely start of sessions, delays in issuing judicial acts, inappropriate behavior of some employees, and insufficient accessibility for citizens. Proposals were made for the development of electronic document management, conducting online sessions, and improving the informational support of court activities.
Mederbek Satyiev instructed to take additional measures to improve the quality of justice, ensure the timely consideration of cases, strengthen discipline during sessions, and foster a respectful and open attitude towards citizens.
