According to documents published in the State Register of Judicial Acts, an investigator from the Investigative Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs filed a petition with the court to reconsider the previously established measure of restraint for the accused Nasyr [name changed Z.N.N.].
According to available information, the subject of the case is the former chairman of the public association "Kyrgyz Hunting and Fishing Union," Z.N.N.
As reported by the Ministry of Justice, the current head of the public association "Union of Hunters and Fishermen of the Kyrgyz Republic" is Sheripov Maksan Mukhanbetovich.
The investigator justified his petition by stating that Nasyr, while being the chairman of the association and having management authority, instead of developing the society, used his position to create a private company, which led to its unprofitability.
At the same time, using his official position, Nasyr misled the members of the society and systematically derived personal benefits, acting in collusion with other board members. Under the pretext of a difficult financial situation, he initiated the sale of property that had been acquired through membership fees since the organization was established in 1959.
The case materials indicate that Nasyr convened a presidium, where one of the agenda items was the consideration of the sale of part of the non-residential premises of the society. As a result of the presidium's decision, the assets were transferred to his private enterprise.
The founder of this company is Nasyr himself, and his son-in-law Y.Y.V., born in 1987, holds the position of general director. According to the sale contract, the society sold non-residential premises with a total area of 322.3 square meters, located on Moskovskaya Street in Bishkek, for 10 million 500 thousand soms.
The investigation believes that these premises were owned by the organization based on the order of the Frunze City Council of Deputies. Despite the contract stating that full payment was made, the money was received in installments, and later part of the funds was returned to the company as a loan.
Furthermore, as indicated in the case materials, at the meeting, Nasyr stated that the received funds would be used for the development of the society, which was recorded in the minutes. Continuing his actions, he reconvened the presidium, where one of the agenda items was the discussion of the sale of a basement space, and another was the rental of part of the premises of the same company.
As a result of the meeting, a sale contract was concluded for a basement space of 61.2 square meters on Moskovskaya Street in Bishkek for 450 thousand soms. This property was also owned by the society based on the relevant order. Thus, Nasyr, acting out of selfish motives and with the board members, unlawfully alienated the property of the public organization in favor of his commercial structure, leading to significant financial losses.
The criminal case was initiated based on a complaint from M.M.Sh. regarding signs of a crime under part 3 of article 210 ("Embezzlement or misappropriation of entrusted property on a large scale") of the Criminal Code. The process has been repeatedly suspended and resumed. The investigation was temporarily halted, but then the General Prosecutor's Office overturned this decision and sent the case back to the Investigative Service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for further work.
Nasyr was detained and placed in the temporary detention facility of the Main Internal Affairs Directorate of Bishkek. The qualification of the crime was changed to points 1, 2 of part 4 of article 210 of the Criminal Code, and on the same day, he was charged with signs of crimes under article 34, point 3 of part 2, points 1, 2 of part 4 of article 210 of the Criminal Code.
The investigative judge of the Pervomaisky District Court of Bishkek chose a measure of restraint for Nasyr in the form of house arrest, and the preliminary investigation period was extended by two months. During the investigation, the accused was repeatedly sent summons to participate in investigative actions.
Nevertheless, the investigation claims that Nasyr did not appear for summons without valid reasons, thereby obstructing the objective investigation of the criminal case.
The investigator emphasized that while at liberty, Nasyr could evade investigation and court proceedings or continue his criminal activities related to the illegal disposal of the society's property. The crimes he is accused of fall into the category of serious offenses and pose a significant public danger.
The material damage caused by the crime has not yet been compensated. Considering all circumstances, the investigator requested to change the measure of restraint from house arrest to detention to ensure a full and impartial investigation, as well as to prevent possible evasion of the accused from the investigation and court.
The investigative judge of the Pervomaisky District Court of Bishkek granted the investigator's request, changing the measure of restraint to detention in institution No. 21 (SIZO-1) of the State Penitentiary Service. Nasyr was taken into custody.
The judicial panel of the Bishkek City Court upheld the decision of the investigative judge on November 3, 2025.
The appeal filed by the defense was not granted, and the ruling is not subject to appeal.
