What lies behind the problem of traffic accidents? Jumagulov emphasizes that Kyrgyzstan has been facing systemic problems for many years:
- driver's licenses are often obtained formally;
- exams are perceived as something surmountable;
- corruption undermines the foundations of access to driving.
How is this issue addressed in other countries? In Germany, there is no fixed training period. Candidates can study for as long as they need, however:
- exams are conducted independently of driving schools;
- examiners bear individual responsibility;
- the practical exam is highly challenging and allows for a significant number of failures.
The complexity of the access process, rather than the duration of training, shapes the driving culture. Germany consistently demonstrates some of the lowest road mortality rates in Europe.The Finnish system, according to Jumagulov, is also considered one of the most effective. It consists of a phased approach:
- basic training and exam;
- probation period after obtaining a license;
- additional training for drivers.
Thus, the focus is on real driving practice, not just the initial stage.In Japan, the exam serves as the main filter of the system, differing in high cost and complexity, requiring candidates to demonstrate skills under stressful conditions.
“Even with relatively short training, the level of discipline on the roads remains high due to strict access requirements,” the expert added.
In the USA and Canada, training can be brief, but a number of measures are applied:
- temporary (conditional) licenses;
- strict sanctions and quick revocation of licenses;
- insurance liability related to driver behavior.
Countries with consistently low levels of traffic accidents are united not by the duration of training, but by the following factors:
- independence of examination bodies;
- transparency of procedures;
- inevitability of failure with poor preparation;
- real accountability of drivers after obtaining a license.
At the same time, the duration of training is of secondary importance.Potential risks for Kyrgyzstan
Jumagulov warns that if institutional mechanisms are not reformed, increasing training periods may lead to:
- growth of shadow schemes;
- reduced accessibility of obtaining licenses for youth from rural and low-income families;
- irritation and distrust towards reforms;
- undermining trust in the very concept of road safety.
Historically, formal tightening of rules without changes in control rarely leads to long-term results.Possible alternatives A more optimal model could include:
- reasonable training periods;
- significant strengthening of exam independence;
- digitalization and video monitoring of examination processes;
- open data on exam results;
- clear mechanisms for appealing and holding examiners accountable.
Such an approach aligns with international standards and reduces social tension.“Road safety largely depends on the quality of institutions. Until the system of access to driving becomes transparent and independent, increasing training periods risks remaining merely a symbolic measure. It is important not only how many months a person studies, but also how strictly and honestly the state decides who can be entrusted with driving a car,” Jumagulov concluded.
The image on the main page is illustrative: https://belkagomel.by.
